Financial Plan: Overview

Abstract
A Practical Guide: Get 500 Years of Clinical Research in 20, Avoid the Apocalypse, and Make Humanity Filthy Rich by Giving Papers
Keywords

war-on-disease, 1-percent-treaty, medical-research, public-health, peace-dividend, decentralized-trials, dfda, dih, victory-bonds, health-economics, cost-benefit-analysis, clinical-trials, drug-development, regulatory-reform, military-spending, peace-economics, decentralized-governance, wishocracy, blockchain-governance, impact-investing

Most financial plans are complicated because the people writing them are either confused or lying. This one is complicated because moving $27 billion annually from military budgets to disease eradication while generating perpetual returns for investors actually IS complicated.

But the architecture is clean: Raise $1B. Spend it to pass the treaty. Manage $27B+ annually forever.

Three financial pillars. That’s it.

For detailed breakdowns, see the linked documents. For the overview that explains why this works, keep reading.

The Three Financial Pillars

1. Fundraising: How To Raise $1.0B

Instrument: VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bonds

  • Target Returns: 272% annually, perpetually
  • Structure: Debt instrument, senior to all other claims
  • Payout: 10% of all 1% Treaty Fund inflows ($2.72B/year)
  • Protection: Bondholders paid before mission spending
  • Collateral: $27.2B+ annual treaty revenue stream
  • The Pitch: “Invest $1B. Get $2.72B/year. Forever.”

Why This Works

  • Simplest pitch in finance: 272% annual returns, perpetual
  • Clean $1B target (vs confusing $1.2-2.5B range)
  • 10% payout is easy math (vs 5% complex calculations)
  • “Forever” beats any finite timeline
  • Better returns than any investment in history

Timeline: 12-24 months to raise $1.0B (simplified structure accelerates fundraising)

2. Campaign Budget: How To Spend $1.0B

Detailed Breakdown: Campaign Budget

The one-time “activation energy” to pass a 1% treaty, made affordable through AI and viral mechanics:

Category Amount Purpose
Global Referendum

$300M

 Viral referral system ($0.20-2.00/vote tiered), 280M votes, platform development. Scenario analysis: $140M-$406M
Political Lobbying

$650M

 AI-targeted campaigns (US/EU/G20), Super PACs, MIC conversion, legal/compliance. Outspends pharma + MIC
Reserve Fund

$50M

 Post-passage transition, contingency buffer

Key Innovations

  • AI does most of the work: 60-80% cost reduction vs traditional campaigns
  • Viral mechanics: $0.20/vote vs $5-15 traditional cost per voter
  • Strategic focus: 20 high-impact countries, not all 195
  • Result: $1B achieves what would cost $2-5B traditionally

Timeline: 36-60 months from first funding to treaty passage

3. Treasury Management: How To Manage $27.2B+ Annually

Once the treaty passes, $27.2B flows annually from military budgets to the 1% Treaty Fund.

Revenue Sources

Primary: 1% treaty ($27.2B annually)

  • 100+ nations contribute 1% of military budgets
  • Verified via satellite imagery and blockchain receipts
  • Penalties for non-compliance enforced via smart contracts

Growth Path

  • Year 1-3: 1% treaty ($27.2B)
  • Year 4-7: 2% Treaty ($54B) - public demands expansion
  • Year 8-10: 5% Treaty ($135B) - exponential success
  • Year 10+: 10%+ ($270B+) - war becomes obsolete

Expenditure Allocation

The 1% Treaty Fund uses an 80/10/10 automatic allocation before any funds reach discretionary spending:

Allocation Percentage Annual Amount Purpose
Pragmatic Clinical Trials & Platform

80%

$21.7B

 Patient subsidies, research, platform
VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bond Returns

10%

$2.72B

 Perpetual investor payments
IAB Political Incentives

10%

$2.72B

 Rewards for supporting legislators

The Fixed Costs (10% + 10% = 20%)

  • VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bond returns: $2.72B annually (10% of treaty inflows)
  • IAB political incentives: $2.72B annually (10% of treaty inflows)
  • Both are sacred and untouchable (or the system fails)
  • Automatically distributed via smart contracts
  • 272% annual returns to bondholders
Everything Else (80%): Decided by Wishocracy

Instead of committees, 8 billion humans vote via pairwise comparisons:

“Patient subsidies for cancer trials” vs “Infrastructure for rural access” Swipe to allocate: 70% / 30%

Billions of micro-decisions aggregate into humanity’s true priorities.

Probable Emergent Allocation (based on human nature):

  • Patient Subsidies (65-75%): People vote to subsidize their own treatments
  • Infrastructure (10-20%): Only as much as necessary to keep platform running
  • Research Incentives (10-15%): Prizes for first-to-cure, breakthrough bonuses
  • Expansion Campaigns (variable): Growing treasury through bigger treaties

Anti-Corruption Built In

  • Can’t bribe 8 billion people
  • Can’t capture a system with no center
  • Can’t redirect funds without majority vote
  • Can’t build $600M headquarters (looking at you, CDC)

Dynamic Patient Subsidies

The revolutionary part: your decentralized institutes of health don’t pay researchers. They subsidize patients.

How It Works

Base Subsidy = Total Treasury ÷ Active Trial Participants

Example with 1M participants:

$27.2B ÷ 1M = $27,000 per patient per year

As more patients join:

5M participants = $5,400 per patient
10M participants = $2,700 per patient

Why This Creates Perfect Incentives

  • Patients organize to grow treasury (2% treaty = double subsidies)
  • Researchers compete to attract patients (better trials win)
  • Insurance companies save money (trials cheaper than chronic care)
  • Everyone wants more people in trials (network effects)

Compare to Grant System

  • NIH grants: 6 months of proposal writing, committees decide, universities take 40% overhead
  • Subsidies via your decentralized institutes of health: Patient wants treatment, joins trial, funds follow automatically, zero overhead

Risk Management

For detailed risk analysis, see Investor Risk Analysis.

Key protections:

  • Assurance contracts: Funds escrowed until milestones hit, automatic refund if targets missed
  • Milestone-based release: Phased funding tied to platform launch, user growth, and treaty progress
  • Downside protection: Even partial treaty adoption ($13B) returns 130% annually to bondholders
  • Smart contract security: Multi-sig wallets, time-locked withdrawals, independent audits
  • On-chain transparency: All treasury movements public, anyone can audit independently

Summary

Component Target Mechanism
Raise

$1B

 VICTORY Incentive Alignment Bonds
Spend Campaign budget Referendum + lobbying + platform
Manage $27.2B+/year 80/10/10 automatic allocation via Wishocracy
Return 272% annually Perpetual 10% of treaty inflows

The math: Invest $1B → Get $2.72B/year → Forever.